Soil Analysis Based on Soil Structure

Monocultures and the replacement of catch crops with high humus reproduction potential by humus-consuming energy crops lead to further humus depletion. That is counterproductive for the challenges of climate change. Humus loss and the associated decline in biological activity increase compaction and erosion and reduce the infiltration and storage capacity for water. This significantly aggravates the consequences of climate change – extreme rainfall, flood risk and drought.

Many scientific methods for soil analysis are available for assessing the ecological functionality as well as the resilience of soils. They use different soil indicators for evaluation: on the water cycle, on nutrient supply, on soil structure and on the vitality of the soil. Depending on the question, they can provide important partial information. Some are very complex and depend on expensive laboratory equipment, but have only a very limited informative value. Others are simple and can be carried out in the field and give a qualitative overall picture.

Soil indicators are important for analysing and evaluating the sustainability of soil management. In the course of the discussion about this, it becomes apparent again and again that the definitions and views of different disciplines regarding soil indicators are manifold and different. Depending on the target value of the investigation, different indicators are also necessary.

*Soil experts worldwide consider the analysis of soil structure condition to be very meaningful.
Water balance, humus content, organism activity and diversity interact with soil structure in complex ways – and thus groundwater and surface water quality, flood risk, erosion risk, trafficability as well as plant nutrition and yield formation.

From 1995 to 2001, I developed a scientific method for assessing soil structure that provides an evaluation specific to soil type and horizon.

It also allows qualitative statements to be made on humus supply, soil life and water holding capacity.

In a slightly simplified form, the method can also be used by any farmer without additional technology.

*Offer: Soil tests and their significance – lecture or seminar

*Offer: Soil evaluation with the Qualitative Structural Analysis according to BESTE – lecture, workshop or seminar.

*Offer: Healthy soil structure – management & analysis – lecture or seminar

Qualitative Structural Analysis

The Qualitative Structural Analysis provides a sound basis for all further measures. Both for the farmer’s practical measures on the soil condition and for management plans for soil regeneration – for example in contract farming.

compacted soil structure - loam
The structure can be examined well with the help of the spade sample.
compacted soil structure - loam
In the process, compaction is also immediately detected in the meso-structure.
soil fertility - sound soil structure  - clay soil
A crumbly, well porous structure is rated positively.
crumbly soil structure - loam
The type of aggregate decay is also tested.

Assessment of Soil Structure

The Qualitative Structural Score according to BESTE is soil-specific and horizon-specific.
This means that there is a special score sheet for sandy, clay and loam soils.
Each soil horizon is evaluated separately.
Scores from 1 – 5 stand for the qualitative result.

The assessment of the structural condition is based on the deviation of the observed actual condition from the described target condition.
This allows for a quick assessment classification.
Characteristic specifications facilitate the decision even with little previous soil science knowledge.

Principle of the Qualitative Structural Score according to BESTE

Test of Aggregate Stability

For the sludge test of aggregate stability according to BESTE, the soil particles are sieved at current soil moisture – i.e. as they were taken from the field. If they are pre-dried, the biological bonding mechanisms are strongly altered!

The silting score was developed for aggregate sizes between 3 and 5 mm, as they show significantly more biological stabilisation mechanisms than smaller aggregates.

The score of the disintegration test is soil-specific.
This means that there is a special score for sandy, clay and loam soils.
The disintegration levels are 2, 1 and 0 for stable, half disintegrated and completely disintegrated.

Often, in scientific publications, a high aggregate stability is inferred to be a biologically stabilised, good structural condition without checking the structure.

However, a microstructural analysis alone ultimately provides clarification as to whether a high aggregate stability was caused by internal compaction of the aggregates, by liming or by biological stabilisation.
It is therefore advisable to carry out both types of analysis.

Test of aggregate stability scheme
Score of the aggregate stability test according to BESTE - here for sandy soils

Example 1:

Analysis of the good ecological status of agricultural land.

Analysis on behalf of the Luxembourg Chamber of Agriculture in German

Example 2:

General survey of 200 areas of contract farmers for a food company.

Summarised result of qualitative microstructure analysis and aggregate stability test